logo for rowmaps web site rowmaps

these web pages
are being produced by
Barry Cornelius

rowmaps@gmail.com
Follow me at http://twitter.com/rowmaps

home

maps
preferences

datasets
KMLs
GeoJSONs

problems
links
posters

tweets
blog
contact

2017-11-09-1450

Problem with HP/Clanfield/17 and WS/Harting/832/1-1

A map is shown below. The underlying map is an Ordnance Survey 1:25000 map that has been produced by Bing. On the underlying map, public rights of way (PROW) are indicated by dashed green lines. Solid lines have been superimposed on top of the underlying map (and will usually hide these dashed green lines). A solid red line signifies a footpath, a solid magenta line signfies a bridleway, a solid green line signifies a restricted byway and a solid blue line signifies a byway open to all traffic (BOAT). These solid lines have been produced from data obtained from the Council of Hampshire (HP) and from the Council of West Sussex (WS). You can click on a solid line to get more details about that PROW. You can click on the + and - buttons to zoom in/out.

There's a bridleway that crosses the border between Hampshire and West Sussex which seems to have a bit that is missing from the datasets provided by the councils of Hampshire and West Sussex.

The bit that is missing runs from about SU743164 (50.94279,-0.94290) to SU744164 (50.94283,-0.94212). I think the gap is about 55 metres long. The bit of the bridleway in the SW is Hampshire's Clanfield 17 and in the NE is West Sussex's HARTING 832/1-1.

I've looked at the online maps provided by Hampshire and West Sussex and the missing bit also seems to be missing from those maps.

I raised this issue with both councils in December 2013. The person from West Sussex said the missing bit is in Hampshire. The person from Hampshire said "this matter is already recorded on our anomalies list and we will investigate the matter in due course". Hampshire had given my query the reference 111003540464.


show map