logo for rowmaps web site rowmaps

these web pages
are being produced by
Barry Cornelius

rowmaps@gmail.com
Follow me at http://twitter.com/rowmaps

home

maps
preferences

datasets
KMLs
GeoJSONs

problems
links
posters

tweets
blog
contact

2017-11-09-1450

Problem with WT/STTO/33, HP/Martin/16, HP/Martin/36 and HP/Rockbourne/33

A map is shown below. The underlying map is an Ordnance Survey 1:25000 map that has been produced by Bing. On the underlying map, public rights of way (PROW) are indicated by dashed green lines. Solid lines have been superimposed on top of the underlying map (and will usually hide these dashed green lines). A solid red line signifies a footpath, a solid magenta line signfies a bridleway, a solid green line signifies a restricted byway and a solid blue line signifies a byway open to all traffic (BOAT). These solid lines have been produced from data obtained from the Council of Hampshire (HP) and from the Council of Wiltshire (WT). You can click on a solid line to get more details about that PROW. You can click on the + and - buttons to zoom in/out. Often the boundary line becomes more obvious if you zoom out.

There's a byway open to all traffic (BOAT) that lies along the boundary between Hampshire and Wiltshire which seems to have a bit that is missing from the datasets provided by the two councils.

The gap is between the S end of WT/STTO/33 and the junction of the PROWs HP/Martin/16, HP/Martin/36 and HP/Rockbourne/33. This is between SU089205 (50.98434,-1.87400) and SU089209 (50.98764,-1.87432). The gap is about 369 metres long.

I don't think it's obvious as whether the gap is in Hampshire or Wiltshire. I've looked at the online maps provided by both Hampshire and Wiltshire. This area is in postcode SP6 3PF and near to SP6 3PD. The gap does not appear as a PROW in either online map. I guess it may be in either council's "list of streets".


show map