rowmaps
these web pages
are being produced by
Barry Cornelius
home
maps
preferences
original data
missing data
KMLs
GPXs
CSVs
GeoJSONs
using Organic Maps
app on a phone
and getting it to
display rights of way
problems
links
posters
tweets
blog
contact
privacy
2022-08-11-1251
Problem with WT/BROA/38 and HP/Martin/20
A map is shown below. The underlying map is an Ordnance Survey 1:25000 map that has been produced by Bing. On the underlying map, public rights of way (PROW) are indicated by dashed green lines. Solid lines have been superimposed on top of the underlying map (and will usually hide these dashed green lines). A solid red line signifies a footpath, a solid magenta line signfies a bridleway, a solid green line signifies a restricted byway and a solid blue line signifies a byway open to all traffic (BOAT). These solid lines have been produced from data obtained from the Council of Hampshire (HP) and from the Council of Wiltshire (WT). You can click on a solid line to get more details about that PROW. You can click on the + and - buttons to zoom in/out. Often the boundary line becomes more obvious if you zoom out.
There's a footpath that lies along the boundary between Hampshire and Wiltshire which seems to have a bit that is missing from the datasets provided by the two councils.
The gap is between the E end of WT/BROA/38 and the NW end of HP/Martin/20. This is between SU057220 (50.99748,-1.91958) and SU058220 (50.99773,-1.91869). The gap is about 103 metres long.
I don't think it's obvious as whether the gap is in Hampshire or Wiltshire. I've looked at the online maps provided by both Hampshire and Wiltshire. This area is in postcode SP5 5DZ. The gap does not appear as a PROW in either online map.